Free download Naked World: America Undercover (2003) subtitles

Notable for early bi-sexual and homosexual sex. Note: If you have a slow computer or connection, film is best viewed as a download. Archival Collection Daniel D. Audio Archive Daniel D. Social Documentary Photography This is a historical 16mm vintage optical sound stag film containing explicit content that was rescued from the trash after Massages An early 16mm French pornographic film from the 's.

Topics: Massages, nude, breasts, vagina, penis, porn, sex, French, 16mm, motion picture, flappers, film, Around the globe -- from Spain to the Czech Republic to Australia -- sex has become pervasive in every genre of television, including talk shows, soap operas, game shows and even cartoons.

Three complete films from the Emmanuelle series dubbed in English other English dubbed copies on the Internet Archive are heavily edited into one hour segments.

Topics: romantic, softcore, sexy, women, French, France, series, s, love. To add English subtitles, open the video with VLC, then drag and drop the. Using VLC's add subtitle file feature may not work, at least it didn't for me.

The English subs were translated from the embedded This is simply pure uninhibited nude fun! A young woman live-streaming herself. Topics: nude, naked, happy. Three girls completely naked have fun together but without sex.

Good little film with three nice looking girls. This is a video shot much earlier by me in It was quite disordered footage and is an excercise in video editing. Creative Commons. Starring: Virginia Bell time : Topics: virginia bell, stripper, erotic, burlesque, vintage, nude. Lullaby of Bareland offers us a burlesque show and nudist camp movie in under and hour. Topics: stripper, erotic, burlesque, vintage, nudism.

Kimo's 8. Then the video switches to my Berkeley studio where I am telling nude Kirsten to not be a hermit. Publicado el 20 mar. Topic: A. Barbara is back! As always, she is erotic juicy sexy fun cozy explicit playful lusty free joyous liberated and I am not bad either! But in this we two explored even deeper our erotic friendship. So I wanted to see if I could still get people to play freely in the more repressive times.

I first asked our neighbor Teresa to do it. She said YES! In fact after a deeply sexy hot erotic juicy sweaty rubbing playing with me on the bed, she said she had been waiting for weeks for me to ask her to play! Who knew? Recorded circa This is a time when we thought this would be easy. After all she was a plant in both a hour process and my performance "In the Mess". In both, she was playing erotically nude with me.

But in this video I had to work hard to get her to get nude. We shot three Canadian TV Topics: tv, naked news. Publicado el 22 nov. Surrender to your natural, authentic being. Return to innocence, a sanctuary for your spirit where you can Publicado el 19 mar. It turned out to be our last six hour performance. In my younger days I did forty eight hour performances! This also turned out to be the last time I got on the mat at the performances. Topics: Frank Moore, performance art, ritual, shamanism, live music, music, dance, experimental, Frank Moore as the Passions' Conductor.

Camera by Les Barany. Well, this is the best example of what happens in my long ritual performances. People playing nude erotically together, playing music jamming together, dancing rubbing together for hours! Meanwhile I was hidden in a tent cave for most of the time! Use your imagination for what was happening in the tent cave. I used the many talents of the Hatt Brothers Build, San Francisco, December 1, This is one of the most sexy erotic explicitly intimate pieces we have done, mainly because of the hot floor dance of Linda and Teresa.

In the band that night was John the Baker, Dr. It was a time of transition. This was one of the last long pieces we did because age was changing us. Oh, you may think the three hour performances that I do today are long. But I had been doing forty eight hour Live music both nights was created by Lob and Dr. This night was deep fun explicit soft erotic warm juicy sweaty tribal intimate. Who knows what happened during the day between the two parts, but by the end of the second night the woman who brought us there would hardly talk to me.

In this video she is one of the We didn't know at the time that this was close to the last performance of this series at the University of California Berkeley. This series, unlike the series in the eighties, was underground, semi-illegal.

The erotic energy was building, the music was growing loud and dangerous. After a couple of more performances, the radical student who was our cover told me her nerves could Topics: Frank Moore, performance art, workshop, ritual, shamanism, dance, U.

So this episode starts with continuing of the scene from the previous episode. In that episode the first half is vigorous passionate abandoned erotic humping grinding moaning of Kirsten and me nude rubbing pleasure prickly aroused friction in bed! Then the reality switched to straight uptight Kirsten fully clothed, obviously her first session with me.

I got her to try on costumes. This episode continues with that scene. What is really going on is acting as someone who has come from another This is a hidden treasure we just dug out of the very bottom box of oldest tapes! Understandable with one or two very thick accents but it also subtitles people in Australia and London! Did HBO an American audience would struggle with anyone not speaking with a raised inflection?!

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Outrageous and insulting Gordon 23 August This film is a film of thousands of naked bodies that is disguised as 'art'. It is a very fine line between 'art' and 'porn'. I am not very convinced that this guy is making art. From the film, he admitted that he was doing this for personal satisfaction.

I think that the only thing that he could be applauded for was being a persuasive person to create a mass hysteria to take off their clothes. I also found it very insulting to the interviewees, that they actually put subtitles to non American speakers of English. I could excuse them putting subtitles on the Russian woman who was speaking English with an accent but it was completely understandable English.

Another outrageous thing was that he critised the French for "not relaxed about their bodies as they think they are". Just because some of the French people refused to pose naked for him, did not mean he could attack others like that. I am angered by this film. The subject of this wonderful documentary, Spencer Tunick, was a surprise when it was shown on cable recently. The controversial artist is seen in an uncanny account of the way he works by the director of the film, Arleene Donnelly Nelson.

We watch as the photographer travels to different countries in order to capture in film humans that pose against impressive backgrounds naked.

Tunick speaks candidly about his ideas and how he goes about it. In interviews we see some of his subjects discussing before hand their ideas and reservations. It's surprising that Mr. Tunick is able to get the hundreds of people to pose for him "en masse" without so much of a problem. His shoot in front of the Cutty Sark, a London landmark, is one of the best pictures we see in the film.

At the same time, it surprises how the Parisian guards of the Louvre come after him when he tried to photograph a naked man in the museum's courtyard with the I. Pei pyramid in the background. We are shocked, in a way, because if anyone, in our minds, should be more understanding, would be the French!

The pictures are not pornographic at all! We see ordinary people posing nude, but there is no desire whatsoever to project anything sexual to the would be viewer, in any way. The people posing for Mr. Tunick do so out of their own free will, as no one is pressured to do otherwise. After watching the film, we get an understanding of the artist and his vision.

I guess Tunick's work as a photographer will always be controversial. Is it pornography or is it art? May be neither.

He does insist though that he does not want to replicate the work of others. He has gone out of his way to create something new To use naked human beings thus is certainly original.

He crowds thousands of them into his foreground He is evidently trying to invent a new texture. It could be done with a thousand sheep though difficult to control but using humans in a public place is daring and adds a touch of eroticism. Is it a coincidence that in nearly every shot we see in the background an erect structure Some of his experimental photos are better than others. One needs a lot of imagination to accept the prone figures lying haphazardly on the wharf below the "Cutty Sark" as a part of the ocean..

I ask you does it really look like a seascape of rippled water or rocky shore? The most interesting part of the film is his interviews with people of different cultures and different attitudes inviting them to divest themselves of their clothes for the sake of "art".

In his world tour he found the people of Montreal cooperative but not so in France or Japan. Amazingly turned up in Melbourne Australia to bare their bodies in rather bleak weather. Is it something to do with mass hysteria? As for Antarctica the few nudes in that icy region did not look at all relaxed and the penguins were rather perplexed too. It was contrived and senseless. A bare backside perched on an icy ledge has no meaning and verges on the ridiculous. One soon gets used to the nudity which pervades this film.

A number of people are asked why they agreed to be naked in front of the lens. The response in most cases was the same Note that in one scene there is a risk of danger in baring one's bottom in a public square. A man hurriedly dons his pants when an unexpected dog appears barking madly! There is one detail which puzzles me. It's this What will Spencer Tunick think of next and how long will this novelty last? Art and nudity have been together in the Western world for thousands of years-dating back to the Ancient Greeks who viewed the body as one of the if not the most beautiful work of art.

That, at least, is the western viewpoint. Other cultures vary; not so much as to whether the body is beautiful or not but rather as to when it is appropriate to display the body to all. Tunick, in this film, goes around the world to try to show the "body is beautiful" viewpoint belongs worldwide. And, to a significant degree, he succeeds.

Actually, his film could be viewed not so much as a film about the human body or nakedness but rather about cultural differences overall. For example, his ease of obtaining volunteers in London versus the problems he had in Ireland shows the cultural differences still existing between those societies.

Particular mention and praise should be made to him going to a post apartheid South Africa and attempting to recruit mostly black models. Virtually all of the models in his previous photo shoots have been white; and this is certainly understandable in places such as Russia only Black Russian I know of is a drink!

However, other peoples with much different skin tones exist and by going to South Africa he certainly attempted to diversify his selection. I commend him for that even though he seemed to be less than totally successful in that endeavor. The only part of the show that I really object to is the Antarctica session. He wanted to do a worldwide show and, in that regards, I understand his decision to go to the Antarctic. But, I still object for a couple of reasons. The first one, most importantly, is that the Antarctic does not have any indigenous human population-the one part of the landed world that does not.